SLI Systems

SLI Systems - a rising search software player

In an industry increasingly devoted to loving or hating Google, and often more focused on turbulent M&A activity than on organic growth, observers could miss the quiet but steady rise a player like SLI Systems. The search software industry has now clearly been divided up in several main segments: enterprise search, site search, ecommerce search, and maybe more.  SLI Systems is more or less on all fronts. From its base in New Zealand, SLI commands a growing market share with revenue rumored to be above $10M and a presence in California and the UK.  The product lineup of SLI is currently the following: Learning Search, Learning Search Ecommerce, Learning Navigation, Site Champion, Ad Champion, Site Search Feedback.  Also important to note that the SLI products are 100% SaaS hosted on the cloud. Clearly SLI started from its origins in Site Search with a traditional crawler, index, search results page approach.   But since then, it has evolved.  In a conversation with Ed Hoffman, VP of Global Business and Corporate Development, I learned about a few aspects which I found interesting:

  • Customer service: SLI has clearly committed itself to great customer service.  In a space obsessed with technology prowess, it may seem old-fashioned but I have heard enough Google Appliance customers complain about it to know that this is a winning strategy if SLI succeeds at it which its growth seems to indicate.
  • Site Champion is an interesting product.  It uses the search analytics data about popular searches to choose content which it pushes to the Google crawlers in the form of optimized landing pages classified in an alphabetic index of popular query terms.  OK, this is not advertising but it’s getting close.  I wonder what the cost ratio between CPC equivalent and site index visits is.  Probably pretty good. Also, I don’t think this is necessarily better in my opinion than Synomia’s semantic version of this system, but very promising.
  • Autocomplete:  SLI has an autocomplete feature much like the Google Suggest.  It’s based on normalized popular queries and suggests queries to users in real time as they type each character of a query.  It’s interesting but since I am a big believer in autocomplete features, I regret that the feature doesn’t return real search results or at least taxonomy-related results like Exorbyte does for instance.

SLI has about 300 clients worldwide.  Most customers probably do not know that the major part of the development happens in New Zealand.  Clearly it’s important to note that SLI has been able to tweak its positioning smartly and quickly and that the SaaS model is probably partially responsible for that.  Good luck and a continued rise for SLI!

Smart Grid Oregon

Newly formed Smart Grid Oregon

Last year and a part of this year, I participated in a very interesting initiative led the Software Association of Oregon, the Oregon Technology Business Center (OTBC), and a group of senior energy industry investors and entrepreneurs led by James Mater of Quality Logic.

The project was an effort to bring together this steering committee of experienced energy professionals with a group of about 30 would-be entrepreneurs in a concerted effort to explore business opportunities and form Oregon-based companies in the Smart Grid area.  The project included initially 4 evening sessions and I joined the project interested about what opportunities might exist for software-based innovations for my work at Exorbyte and beyond.

I will not bore you with a list of what I learned during this project.  I must say however that the best outcomes was the interactions with knowledgeable steering committee members and peers.  The team I joined achieved promising initial results in the area of energy storage and distributed generation.

This great project did spawn an organization which will quickly come on every Smart grid or Energy professional’s radar in the Northwest very soon:  Smart Grid Oregon The board of SGO is diverse and shows great promise with key entrepreneurial, investment, legal, and legislative players.  Join quickly while the structure is still falling into place and you may have a shot at making a greater contribution!  Phil Keisling is the board’s Chairman and can be contacted at phil@smartgridoregon.org about memberships.

Obama and I
Obama and I linked by Linkedin.
Dual window capture to avoid large image size.  So I promise, the Pres. is at the top of that list on my profile!

I was very surprised to find that my Linkedin profile featured President Obama as a person which users also looked up on Linkedin while checking me out!  Of course I immediately thought of complaining to Linkedin customer service since they omitted to feature me on Obama’s page along with Hillary Clinton, Kevin Bacon, and Bill Gates.  What is wrong with these people?! ;-)

Then I sat back closed the draft email to Linkedin customer service team and realized this might be a bug ; or maybe everyone had Obama in their list.  Do you?  I feel flattered but I have a hard time understanding how such a great feature (obviously made to foster new relevant links between members) can work if it features popular profiles at the top of the list.  Everyone is going have the same people on their list.  Anyone knows what algorithms Linkedin uses?

Maybe Steven Stegman, Research Scientist and Senior Product Manager at LinkedIn can tell us.  See his post about the feature.

If you want to view my profile just send me a message through our contact form and I’ll connect to you.  Sorry but I have no public profile and this feature is on the private one anyway.

I received an interesting video from a friend.  After the Kevin Costner solution, why not the good ol’southern boys solution?

Get the Flash Player to see this content.

Interesting idea.  I can think of many reasons why this surprising idea to clean up the oil slick could possibly not work but:
  1. I did test the principle of oil sticking on dried grass this afternoon with motor oil at home in my garage and it does the job very well.
  2. Ideas like this seem no better than the other chemical or mechanical solutions in use today when they first appeared.

I say this needs to be developed.  What do you think?

Larry Page as Octopus

Possible outcome: Larry Page turning Google as an octopus monopoly?

I read an article in the the French equivalent of the NYT today (LeMonde.fr) which had an interview of Larry Page, Google’s co-founder during a visit he made to the company’s Paris offices.  I found some its content shockingly undemocratic and contrary to Google’s motto : “Don’t be evil.”  Here is the section I want to discuss:

Le Monde.fr: You store a lot of data on your servers. Is this really necessary?

Most of this data is web page content, keywords, IP addresses [the identifier of a computer] . But you’re not logged in: we have little personal information, unlike credit card companies. Our search engine works to improve the quality of responses to search queries, and for that we need all this information. Our ambition is to organize all the information of the world, not just part of it. I am nevertheless concerned that some may feel that retaining so much information is not a good thing. That’s why we offer tools that users can see and control our use of their data ["Service Dashboard"].

The tone is shocking to me.  How can Larry say in the same interview that:

  1. Google is worried about the undemocratic practices of government censorship in some countries,
  2. and then proceed to say that his corporation (a well meaning company but still inherently undemocratic like all corporations because controlled by a limited group of stockholders) holds the ambitions of organizing the information of the entire world.

Larry hedges against critics by saying that he is aware of privacy issues but let’s give Larry some slack on the privacy for a sec.  This is another issue entirely.  What’s democratic about a single group of stockholders controlling the tools that allow the entire humanity to access information beyond verbal contacts with their face-to-face network of friends and colleagues ? ? !

In another section of the article, Larry says that he worries about politically motivated censorship.  By saying so, one could assume he cares about the effect healthy political structures like that of a democracy have on people’s life.  Does he?  Does his ambitions run smack into conflict with his political views?  Or does he confuse economic liberalism with democracy for his own self-interest and greed? Or is just confused after years of trying to keep a tornado like Goolge under control?

Please react.

Utilties Gatekeeper The Smart grid has been one hell of a buzz word lately.  There doesn’t seem to be a day in the life of the high tech industry that doesn’t bring a new VC investment story or a new disruptive pilot project.  Looking at this from the outside, one would think everything is fine and dandy in Smart Grid Land.  But insiders know better.

I sat on a panel recently with an Intel VC who chose to insist on the fact that Intel Capital’s investment strategy for  the energy industry had started to focus on startups that could show they had utility endorsement, support or even a contract with a utility.  Because, as he put it, “nothing much happens or will happen on the grid without utilities approval”.

The same regulatory framework that have made utilities slaves to the gargantuan appetites of US energy consumers, have also laid the ground work for a “walled-garden” market where the consumer, the technology vendors, and all other players are slave to utility approvals.  Utilities alone are licensed by the PUCs (Public Utility Commissions) to perform net metering, to allow demand-response networks to operate, to allow renewable energy asset to connect to the grid, etc.

How do you think this will play out?

The site of the startup MyWeboo, a company started by 15 yearl Diane Keng, crashed several times today under the strain of media coverage after the company appeared at the Web 2.0 conference in San Francisco.   The Valley seems filled with teens these days. Not that techies never allowed kids around their corporate campuses. It’s just that teens are seen at the helm of some of the most promising startups these days (MyWeboo.com, . Having a 15 year old in the driver seat of a hot software company is just not enough anymore to amaze Silicon Valley crowds.

Gurbaksh Chahal started Click Agents at 16, and sold it for $40 million at 18.  BlueLithium was his second startup which he sold for $300 million at 25.  Kristopher Tate, 16 launched Zooomr.  Mr. Tate, now 22, runs a portfolio of Internet companies from Tokyo.

Well of course that’s not always very pleasing for seasoned entrepreneurs to see kids 15 or 20 years younger getting more love from VCs and the media than they ever could. But let’s leave the generational divide aside and recognize that this is a reality which is here to stay.  Whether you like it or not, startups like Facebook, started by 20 year old Mark Zuckerberg have turned the teen entrepreneur into a reality that doesn’t scare the VC rainmakers of Silicon Valley anymore. But this new category of startups probably doesn’t compete with the startups started by more experience executives in any other area than VC attention and in media coverage.  There is a lot more to the life and success factors of an entrepreneur than these last two variables.

Is this a fad? Is there a structural reason for that teen surge?  Here are a few reasons that I see as at origin of the trend:

  1. Starting a company in the Valley is not a solitary garage-based endeavor anymore.  The process of launching new software companies, especially web centric ones, has become highly standardized and well documented.  That’s partially thanks to the Internet itself of course.  Anyone can easily educate themselves on the entrepreneurial process.  Starting a company today often involves early promotion and marketing outreach to mobilize investors and future customers  before the product even has a name or features to speak of.  This has allowed non-traditional technology entrepreneurs to enter the fray by ever larger numbers and that involves teenagers, non-technical professionals, etc.
  2. The Internet is becoming a teen wonderland.  The continued development of social media, cloud software, and other Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 technologies has a lot more to do with fashion, design, marketing, Hollywood, and the media than it did back in the days of Netscape.  Techies are leaving the stage to go backstage gradually and that stage is littered with niche opportunities for teen entrepreneurs as well teen consumers.
  3. The entrepreneur as a rock star.  The process of starting companies has been so romanticized by our fame and wealth obsessed culture.  But the fact is that the entrepreneur has also become more of a figure head, a symbol, a figurehead of the company than its actual day-to-day captain.  That’s how the COO position has become so prevalent in younger companies.  Consequently, entrepreneurs and their VCs look more and more like rock starts and their impresarios these days.  Just like in the music business, a wonder kid is always more appealing than an old gizzard if you want to capture people’s imagination.
  4. The heirs at the helm in their playground.  Some, not all, but enough to notice.  Many new teen entrepreneurs are Valleyites, sons and daughters of former Silicon Valley investors, entrepreneurs, engineers (ex: Diane Keng from MyWeboo.com).  Nothing wrong with following in daddy or Mommy’s steps but that’s surely much easier than fighting your way alone to a different future than that of your parents.  Having gone to school at one of the upscale high schools of the Valley in Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Atherton, Saratoga or Los Altos makes for lots of inside knowledge, powerful friends, and motivation to emulate others’ successes .  The Bay Area really started its transition to technology in the late 60s and 50 years later, a couple of generations later, and two or three tech bubbles later, where else would these Net kids want to swim than in this pond they know inside out and where the upside is still so high.

So, there you have it: the teen entrepreneur is just another one of these expected twists in the unscripted history of a Silicon Valley as it keeps leading a good chunk of the world of technology.

What do you think?

search button1 150x150 Whos Important for Search Software Industry Marketers (Analysts, Media, Events)Here is list of online resources which we developed for a client and which all search software marketers should know about:

In entering the US market, it becomes obvious that there are a number of topics that are seen in the US as being strongly related to site search and the activities that Synomia has been specializing into.  These areas of focus each have their pundits, analysts, conferences, and sometimes publications that are important to consider for an appropriate marketing launch.
Search Engine Software
www.searchenginewatch.com – Danny Sullivan is the specialist of the area for almost 15 years now.
http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/ and http://arnoldit.com/search-wizards-speak/ -Stephen Arnold is a key pundit and sells a number of services to vendor to help them (if he likes them) get “on the radar” of customers and the industry.
http://www.searchtools.com – Avi Rappoport is a pillar of information about search (consultant and analyst) but the site has become less maintained lately.
http://www.searchengineland.com – Key news source for customers and vendors alike.
http://www.altsearchengines.com/ – newer blog maintained by Charles S. Knight – mostly about web search and not updated often.  However the blog has been terminated as of May 1st as far as we know.
http://websearch.about.com/ – Wendy Boswell is a web search guide and the editor of this area of About.com.  She has for instance organized interviews with executives of various search software companies.  Note this quasi directory of search engine companies:  http://websearch.about.com/blsearchenginesatoz.htm

Content Management

Web Content and Usability
http://www.web2expo.com/ – (Fall and Spring) – East and West Coats
http://webcontentconferences.com/ – (June) – Chicago, IL

SEO
http://www.pubcon.com/ (November) – Las Vegas, NV

Information Architecture

Name URL
Agency Directories http://www.web-development.com/US/

http://www.websitedesignerslist.com

http://www.webdesigners-directory.com

http://www.agencytool.com/

http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/search?search=web+development

http://www.selected-webdesign.com

http://www.aaaa.org/eWeb/DynamicPage.aspx?webcode=AgencySearchResults
Google Queries http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&q=web+design+company+portal&btnG=Recherche+Google&meta=lr%3Dlang_en&aq=f&cad=h

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&rls=com.microsoft:*:IE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7ADBF_en&ei=HumVSq_KLof-sgPPsu2mDA&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=%22faceted+search%22+%22interactive+agency%22+-seo+-advertising&spell=1

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&rls=com.microsoft%3A*%3AIE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7ADBF_en&q=%22site+search%22+%22interactive+agency%22+-seo+-advertising&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&rls=com.microsoft%3A*%3AIE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7ADBF_en&q=agency+%22information+architecture%22+search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft%3A*%3AIE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7ADBF_en&as_q=content&as_epq=interactive+agency+&as_oq=media+corporate&as_eq=seo&num=10&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=all&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=off

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&rls=com.microsoft:*:IE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7ADBF_en&q=content+media+OR+corporate+%22interactive+agency+%22+-seo+-social&start=10&sa=N

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&rls=com.microsoft%3A*%3AIE-SearchBox&rlz=1I7ADBF_en&q=political+campaign+%22web+development%22+google+search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
Wikipedia Details http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_agency

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_development
CMS Watch http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/

http://www.cmswatch.com/Reports/Vendors/
Design Marketplace http://www.designfirms.org/

If you are interested in getting more information on this topic or related services from the OrigoTerra consulting team, contact us.

In the context of a new market entry in the US, the new entrant should focus on achieving visibility and legitimacy.  The inherent lack of these two qualities is what sets a new entrant apart from incumbents in a market like the US.  To achieve the above the company needs to take in account the type of activities required (including budgets).  The list of activities below will contribute to planning of its launch.
 
Establishing Legitimacy: Preparing the Launch
 
Content Localization
Product that are new to the US market sometimes need to be customized or re-packaged to look familiar and be understandable to US customers.  In SaaS software for instance, the look and feel of the web site, the administrative interfaces, the templates, and other graphical and written elements of the product should be tested against US customer expectations.  Improvements to the company’s marketing materials (brochures, other collateral, etc.), web site, and even software interfaces can all be handled by a specialized US-based localization agency.
This type of effort must take in accounts dimensions such as:
  • American culture (colors, tone, etc.)
  • American user behavior
  • Logo and icon design
  • Layout customs
  • Branding for the US
  • Localized imagery and colors
  • US search engine keywords
  • Regional look and feel
  • Source text translation
  • Foreign currency conversion
  • US Terms and Conditions
  • META tag localization
 
Rewriting of marketing materials and messaging framework
Such improvement to content and interfaces can be achieved through the overall proof-reading and re-writing of the site, brochures, and messaging by an experienced US-based marketer or communications agency.  This type of initial project typically costs about $15,000 for a 15-30 pages site and 1-5 brochures.
 
Additional Collateral
The US business culture requires more marketing materials than currently available.  Such materials could include case studies and an explanatory video demo or an actual functional demo that customers can play with.  This type of work will cost anywhere from $2,000 to $10,000 depending what the company chooses to do.
 
Conference and Events
The new market entrant should also consider being present at key events where professionals of its industry meet.  Given the size of the US and relative concentration and specialization of businesses accross a few key metropolital business centers, meeting at events is often the only way to engage face-to-face with customers, peers, and competitors.  Here are some events to consider if you re in the content management software industry or the searh software industry:
http://www.cmsexpo.net/ (May) – Evanston, Illinois
http://www.cm-strategies.com/ (April) – Santa Clara, CA
http://www.searchenginestrategies.com/ (multiple dates) – multiple cities
http://www.pubcon.com/ (November) – Las Vegas, NV
http://webcontentconferences.com/ – (June) – Chicago, IL
http://www.web2expo.com/ – (Fall and Spring) – East and West Coats
Most of these conferences require an investment of between $5,000 to $20,000 for exhibitors and $800 to $2,500 per visitor.  Most have between 300 to 5000 visitors.  They are a key way for US professionals to connect with vendors, colleagues and analysts.  They are a must of any marketing launch plan.
 
Analysts Coverage
In the US, industry analysts are very important as they tend to be the first line of defense against unreliable new products and the only somewhat neutral presence in a largely unregulated market.  They also prescribe vendor solutions to early adopters and certain purchasers and cover vendors in their reports and analysis.  Getting analyst coverage doesn’t necessarily require a large budget but typically requires dedicated marketing / technical contacts over time to get them to include a new vendor in their research.  Some specialized tech marketing agencies offer specialized services to book analyst briefings for a company.  $5,000 to $10,000 will get a company a good chance to get all analysts aware of its products and at least one or two analyst briefings with in more depth coverage over a 2 to 3 month campaign.
 
Establishing Visibility: Actual US Marketing launch
Launching a new software product in the US requires to start with a variation of the classical B2B software launch strategy.  In the US, the launch of a new software product is almost never solely focused on direct sales.  Visibility on the scale of the North-American continent requires more than a few reps walking the streets.  Because customers are spread across large territories much sales happens through the phone, the internet and other non-physical means of contact.  Many of these channels are jammed with marketing from other vendors and administered by intermediaries (search engines, trade press, purchase departments, etc.).
To achieve visibility in these channels, here are a number of methods that need to be considered and budgeted for:
 
Online Search Advertising
Search advertising is important.  About 80% of web searches happen on Google and their programs of sponsored links and AdWords allow vendors to get significant visibility.  It is even proven that many customers do research relying on these purchased links as an indication of legitimacy.  A well targeted budget for search advertising can be anywhere between $100 and $1,500 per month.
 
Targeted Web Adverting
Advertising in targeted locations where professionals of the search, content management, information architecture, etc.  The cost of such campaigns is usually not very expensive if they are carried out outside the main advertising networks (Google, Doubleclick, etc.).  An average CPC (Cost per Click) is typically around $0.50 and average conversion rates of 2.5% give a cost of $10,000 for 400 targeted site visitors.
 
Social Networking and Blogging
It is now proven how important these platforms are to an effective marketing strategy in the US market.  Many large and small technology companies maintain a corporate blog and use applications like Linkedin and Twitter to generate “buzz” around their products or services.  For about $1,000 to $3,000 per month technical writers can be secured that will create blogs, and publish articles about a given company for its launch or as an ongoing program.
 
Direct Mail and Email Opt-In Campaign
Lists of professionals of various areas can be secured who agree with receiving information about new products and services.  Such targeted campaigns to a few thousand relevant professionals (information architects, content managers, webmasters, etc.) can cost anywhere between $5,000 and $10,000.
 
Prospection Campaign
Getting in front of the right people is often difficult, especially when looking for customers or channel partners who tend to be weary of new foreign companies and professionals with unfamiliar affiliations like new foreign vendors and their staff are.  A professional business developer can be hired to prospect for first contacts for $75 to $150 per hour.  A 3 weeks campaign may then cost about $9,000 to $18,000.  It can really help accelerate penetration in the market.
 

If you are interested in getting more information on this topic or related services from the OrigoTerra consulting team, contact us.

We recently did an analysis of all the relevant players of site search software market in the US and globally.  This is the market for software products (search engines) used to search the content of one or several web sites (not the whole web).  Site search software is purchased by the operators of rather large sites (10,000 > millions of web pages).

Site search is definitely a different category from web search.  The technology used to analyze, index, and then search a web site of a few hundreds of thousand of pages is very different from that used to search the trillions of pages in the whole web.  The users also expect better results from site search because of the control they assume the site operators have over their content (no one controls the Web but a single web site has to be organized enough to be easily searchable).

This market is served by a variety of pure play offerings and others coming from the enterprise search market.  Enterprise search software is usually focused at searching multiple types of data and document sources such as databases, document management systems, network resources, and also intranet web sites of course.  Finally there is one more sizable player: Google.

Here is an overview of the market players:

site search market competitor matrix

partial site search market competitor matrix


Competition in the US market can be fierce.  This statement clearly holds true in the search software market.  This
sector includes many competitors with a wide variation of market strategies, product offerings, and ambitions.  In the US search software market, competition appears to be more varied, more advanced and more entrenched than in Europe.

Based on research conducted with web agencies, potential customers, and other industry stakeholders, OrigoTerra concluded that a number of previously unseen competitive forces are conspiring to go after the under-exploited site search market segment.

Google

Google Appliance and Google Site Search (SaaS) have been polishing their offerings (prices and distribution channels).  The brand name recognition of Google in this arena is so high that even though their offering is often poor in any given segment, organizations seem to be often betting on Google’s ability to meet their expectations in the near future.  Almost every single customer and partner respondents to our survey cites Google as the obvious choice.  There are complaints about Google Appliance not being easy enough to configure for the most complex of applications.  There are also some complaints from enterprise customers regarding its ability to accommodate more than a million documents.  However, a number of users complain of the lacking real customer support.  Google claims 20,000 Appliance clients.  This remains to be verified what this figure represents (number of appliances sold, number of customers, number of administrators, etc.).
Another notable contribution of Google in the larger search market (including the consumer search market) is that Google has converted more Internet users to using search than never before.  They have effectively made Internet users “search oriented”.  Wherever, users go today, they expect search to be available as a default infrastructure for navigating any large body of content.
http://www.google.com/enterprise/search/gsa.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2-45vCssTQ&feature=related
http://usasearch.gov/search?affiliate=webcontent.gov&v%3Aproject=firstgov&query=fleckenstein
(note also the “powered by Vivisimo” mention on that page)
http://www.webcontent.gov

Lucene

Lucene is an open source search software system for the Apache web server (~50% of all web servers in the world use Apache1).  While Lucene is notorious to require some development expertise for optimal deployment and configuration, there are already third party integrators specializing in its installation (ex:  Lucid Imagination – http://www.lucidimagination.com).  This is possibly a strong alternative for customers that should be considered a relevant alternative to Google Appliance.

Omniture

Omniture is clearly going after the site search market with an offer priced to compete with Google (25k for 100,000 pages).  Their main differentiation is the analytics features offered alongside and part of the core legacy Omniture software offering.  The Atomz hosted site search software which Omniture acquired has remained a low-end offering at $25 per year.

SLI Systems

SLI Systems is an enterprise offering which offers a consistent and well design product.  Several respondents cite it as a contender for large web sites with great features.  The price remains above $50K for the software license and it requires significant initial implementation engineering; which places the system closer to the enterprise offerings.

Blossom Search

Hosted site search Blossom is a simple and very affordable product which has a loyal following of municipalities and other customers but which doesn’t seem to actively pursue new customers.  Price : about $10 per month and up.

If you are interested in getting more information on this topic or related services from the OrigoTerra consulting team, contact us.